| Recycling plastics saves
resources The development of plastic
materials has exploded in the second half
of the XXth century.
Production of plastic materials in the
world rose from less than 5 million tons
in the 1950s to some 80 million tonnes in
1997. Consumption of plastics in Western
Europe was about 28 million tons in 1997
(35% of world production).
Click
here to see the different types of
plastics
Plastic packaging waste
represents about 60% of the total plastic
waste.
The distribution and industry sectors
generate some 2,6 million tons out of the
9.8 million tons of post-user packaging
waste produced in Western Europe.
Household waste represent more than 70%
of the overall plastic packaging waste.
Source: European Directive on
packaging and packaging waste
The production of 1 kg of plastics
consumes between 1.8 and 2 kg of oil.
When plastic in burnt for energy
recovery approximately half of the energy
content is lost.
Source: Comparing
feedstock recycling of plastics waste to
mechanical recycling methods, Dr A.
Tukker, TNO, 2002.s
- Recycling
PVC saves resources
A previous study realised by the
Wuppertal Institute applied MIPS
methodology to PVC drinking water
pipes.
MIPS - material intensity per service
unit - includes all man-induced material
displacements from cradle to grave
counted in mass units. The study provides
an overview of processes and material
input-data for the production of PVC used
for drinking water pipes. It does not
include the dismantling of post-consumer
PVC pipes. The results show that the
secondary PVC is more economical from a
resources point of view than the primary:
| |
Primary
PVC ( in t/t of PVC ) |
Secondary
PVC( in t/t of PVC ) |
| Material
|
8,3
|
5,0
|
| Water |
118,9
|
62,2
|
| Air |
2,6
|
2,4
|
Source: Wuppertal
Papers Nr. 63, October 1996
Further
information: Recycling PVC reduces
environmental impacts
Did
you know? - Recycling Plastics
- Mechanical recycling of
plastics saves energy
The TNO (Netherlands Organisation for
Applied Scientific Research) paper
compared four options for the treatment
of the plastic waste: municipal solid
waste incineration (MSWI), energy
recovery or blast furnaces, feedstock
recycling and mechanical recycling. It
concludes that from an energy point of
view, mechanical recycling is in
theory the best option because it permits
to save the feedstock energy that is
embodied in the plastic itself (+/- 40
MJ/kg) as well as the energy used for
producing the primary resin (between 40
and 50 MJ/kg). The incineration with
municipal waste is generally the least
favourable option in environmental terms.
One main reason for this is that it
allows recovering maximum 50 % of the
calorific value contained in the plastic.
The study concludes that mechanical
recycling is favourable provided that via
advanced separation and upgrading
technologies a high-quality recycling can
be reached.
If this is not the case (and notably when
recycling only leads to
"downcycling" like the use of
secondary plastics in park benches, fancy
ballpoints and road side guidance piles)
the advantages provided by mechanical
recycling might not be convincingly
better than feedstock recycling or
co-incineration with energy recovery (for
instance in cement kilns).
Source: Comparing
feedstock recycling of plastics waste to
mechanical recycling methods, Dr A.
Tukker, TNO, 2002.
To
know more:
The plastics mechanical recycling process
in pictures
Further
information: Recycling plastics
protects the environment
To
know more: Recycling saves resources

|